Author: Rexje

The Netherlands: A Nation Under Pressure.

8 June 2025

The Netherlands, once admired for its balanced welfare system and high quality of life, is becoming a state that prioritizes the needs of newcomers—migrants, expats, and foreign students—over its own citizens. While Dutch taxpayers carry the load, government policy increasingly rewards foreign labor, asylum seekers, and international institutions, leaving many Dutch citizens feeling abandoned in their own country.

The housing crisis

Foreigners first, locals last

The housing crisis illustrates this imbalance clearly. Young Dutch citizens spend years on waiting lists for social housing, sometimes up to 12 years in urban areas like Amsterdam or Utrecht. Meanwhile, asylum seekers and refugees are routinely prioritized for urgent housing due to agreements between municipalities and the national government.

According to Demografische ontwikkelingen Nederland, CBS, over 100,000 newcomers entered the country through asylum and family reunification in 2023. Despite a shortage of homes, the government continues to mandate housing for thousands of migrants, often in newly built accommodations—while native Dutch people are told to be patient.

Investors and expats inflating the market

Another factor driving unaffordability is the influx of expats and international investors. Entire neighborhoods in cities like Amsterdam are bought up by foreign landlords or filled with expats benefiting from generous tax incentives. These groups are able to pay inflated rents that Dutch workers cannot afford.

Expats and elite privileges

The 30%-regeling

The Dutch government offers expats a unique tax benefit: the “30%-regeling.” This allows highly paid foreign workers to receive up to 30% of their salary tax-free for five years. According to Expatregeling onder vuur, NRC, this costs the treasury hundreds of millions of euros annually and creates an uneven playing field for native Dutch professionals.

Dutch citizens performing the same work pay full tax—while their expat colleagues, hired through multinational companies or tech firms, receive elite treatment. This system undermines social cohesion and rewards globalism over national loyalty.

Cheap labor, expensive consequences

Importing workers to keep wages low

The Netherlands actively imports labor migrants for logistics, agriculture, and care sectors. While employers benefit from cheap and flexible labor, the public pays the price through pressure on services, falling wages, and rising housing demand.

The Migratie en arbeidsmarkt, Adviesraad Migratie, reports that many labor migrants live in cramped, substandard housing and rarely integrate into society. They often rely on municipal support and compete directly with lower-income Dutch workers for basic services.

Displacement and degradation

Rather than investing in better pay and working conditions to attract local workers, Dutch companies rely on foreign labor to keep wages low. This short-term strategy is profitable for business, but harmful for long-term social stability and cohesion.

Universities for sale

International students over native youth

Dutch universities aggressively recruit foreign students to fill their coffers. Programs are now taught almost exclusively in English, and classrooms are overcrowded. Dutch students are often pushed out of their own system, forced to compete with international applicants for a shrinking number of spots.

According to Internationalisering in het hoger onderwijs, Inspectie van het Onderwijs, over 40% of students in Dutch universities are now foreign nationals. The Dutch language is disappearing from academia, and native students are losing their place in their own institutions.

Housing and infrastructure strained

International students flood university towns, increasing demand for housing and causing shortages. Dutch students often end up commuting long distances or delaying their education entirely due to lack of access to affordable accommodation.

Public services under strain

Healthcare, transport, and education at capacity

Dutch citizens fund public services through some of the highest taxes in Europe. Yet they increasingly face long waiting times at hospitals, crowded public transport, and overstretched schools.

The Jaarverslag IND, Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid, shows asylum-related costs have exceeded €4.4 billion annually. These funds go toward housing, legal support, social integration, and welfare—all at the expense of the native population, whose services decline as resources are diverted.

Tax burden on the middle class

While costs increase, the tax burden remains squarely on the shoulders of Dutch workers. Middle-class families are paying more for fewer services while government policy continues to subsidize new arrivals.

Cultural and demographic erosion

Becoming strangers in their own neighborhoods

In cities like Rotterdam, Amsterdam, and The Hague, Dutch natives are becoming minorities. According to Bevolkingssamenstelling, CBS 2024, more than half of the residents in these cities have a migration background. This trend has deep cultural consequences.

Traditional customs, holidays, and values are increasingly discouraged as exclusionary or outdated. In public schools, Sinterklaas is labeled controversial, and halal-only food policies are introduced. Children grow up feeling they must apologize for their heritage.

Cultural dilution

The Dutch language and traditions are being replaced by multicultural policies that do not integrate, but segregate. According to De Erosie van de Nederlandse Cultuur, Elsevier Weekblad, these trends are encouraged by political elites and international organizations under the banner of inclusivity and diversity—while the native population is expected to give way silently.

The myth of “economic necessity”

More people, not more prosperity

Open-border advocates claim immigration is essential for economic growth. But this is misleading. While GDP may rise, GDP per capita often falls. According to Immigratie en de Welvaartsstaat, CPB, low-skilled migrants cost more in public spending than they contribute in taxes.

The reality is a managed economy focused on appearances rather than substance. Growth is measured in numbers, not in living standards. The average Dutch citizen sees no benefit—only higher costs, lower wages, and fewer opportunities.

Democratic betrayal

No voice, no vote

Despite widespread dissatisfaction, Dutch citizens are given no real say. Referenda are blocked. Critical voices are silenced or demonized. Parties that question mass immigration are kept out of power through political cordons.

The mainstream media, subsidized by government funds, enforces a narrow narrative. Critics of immigration policy are labeled “extremist” or “xenophobic,” regardless of the facts or their intentions.

Toward quiet demographic replacement

A policy without consent

This is not mere mismanagement—it is a structural transformation. Whether driven by EU directives, neoliberal economics, or globalist ideology, the effect is clear: native Dutch citizens are being systematically deprioritized.

As outlined in Het Grote Ontkennen, Paul Scheffer, demographic trends now suggest a long-term displacement of the native population in cities and key institutions. The question is no longer whether this is happening—but why it is allowed to continue without open democratic debate.

Conclusion: restore national priorities

The Netherlands must return to a policy of serving its own people first. This includes:

  • Ending expat tax privileges
  • Halting low-wage labor migration
  • Limiting foreign student intake
  • Prioritizing Dutch citizens for housing, jobs, and education
  • Protecting the Dutch language and cultural identity

A state that no longer serves its own population loses its legitimacy. A government that refuses to listen to its people becomes a tool for foreign interests. If the Netherlands wishes to remain a sovereign, functional society, it must urgently reevaluate its priorities—and put the Dutch first again.

Fish Need Oxygen Too, It Is Just Different

5 June 2025

When most people think of breathing, they picture lungs expanding and contracting, pulling air into the body. Breathing is often thought of as something that applies primarily to land animals — mammals, birds, reptiles. Fish, living underwater, are mistakenly assumed to be outside of this basic biological need. But that assumption couldn’t be further from the truth. Fish, like all aerobic organisms, rely on oxygen for survival. The way they obtain it is different, but the need is the same.

Oxygen fuels life. Whether you’re a person walking on land or a trout swimming upstream, every cell in your body depends on oxygen to function. The distinction lies in the medium: land animals take in gaseous oxygen from air, while fish extract dissolved oxygen from water using specialized organs called gills. This critical process underpins every aspect of a fish’s health and behavior. When oxygen levels drop, the consequences are immediate — and often fatal.

Why oxygen is essential to all animals

The energy equation of life

All complex organisms perform a process called cellular respiration, where glucose and other nutrients are broken down to produce ATP — the energy currency of cells. Oxygen acts as the final electron acceptor in this chain reaction, making it indispensable. Without oxygen, cells cannot efficiently convert food into usable energy, leading to dysfunction, organ failure, and eventually death.

As highlighted in Why oxygen is vital for energy production, by Dr. Elias McKinley, oxygen is not just useful — it is fundamental to every living system beyond simple anaerobes. For vertebrates, it’s an absolute requirement.

Fish are no exception. Every muscle contraction, every neuron firing in a fish’s brain, every beat of its heart depends on oxygen. The misconception that aquatic animals don’t “breathe” in the traditional sense has led many to underestimate how sensitive fish are to oxygen levels.

How fish breathe: anatomy of the gills

Gill function and structure

Fish do not have lungs. Instead, they use gills, which are highly vascularized organs designed to extract oxygen from water. Located on either side of the head, gills consist of bony arches lined with thin filaments. Each filament contains rows of lamellae — small, plate-like structures where blood flows in capillaries just beneath a thin surface. This is where gas exchange happens: oxygen diffuses into the blood, and carbon dioxide diffuses out.

The process only works effectively when water is continuously moving across the gill surfaces. Most fish achieve this by swimming with their mouths open or by rhythmically opening and closing their mouths and opercula (gill covers) to push water over their gills.

Counter-current exchange: nature’s efficiency

Fish have evolved an ingenious method to maximize oxygen uptake called counter-current exchange. In this system, water flows across the gills in the opposite direction of blood flow. This creates a constant gradient where oxygen concentration is always higher in the water than in the blood, allowing for efficient diffusion even when water oxygen levels are low.

According to Aquatic biology fundamentals, by J. Thorne, this mechanism allows fish to extract up to 80-90% of the available oxygen from water — a much higher efficiency than human lungs can achieve with air.

Water contains far less oxygen than air

Basic oxygen content comparison

Air contains roughly 21% oxygen by volume, whereas water — even under ideal conditions — holds less than 1% dissolved oxygen. This enormous difference means that fish must work harder and more efficiently to obtain the oxygen they need.

Water chemistry for aquaculture, by Lena Hsu, notes that various factors affect how much oxygen water can hold:

  • Temperature: Cold water holds more oxygen than warm water.
  • Salinity: Freshwater holds more oxygen than saltwater.
  • Movement: Stagnant water holds less oxygen than moving water.
  • Depth and light: Deeper, darker waters often have less oxygen, especially if there are no plants or light.

In short, oxygen is not distributed evenly throughout aquatic environments. Fish living in still ponds, warm tropical waters, or overpopulated tanks face a higher risk of oxygen depletion.

Hypoxia: the invisible killer

What is hypoxia?

Hypoxia is a condition where oxygen levels in water drop too low to support aquatic life. For fish, hypoxia leads to immediate physiological stress, disorientation, gasping behavior at the surface, and ultimately suffocation. In fish farms or home aquariums, this is one of the most common and misunderstood causes of mass die-offs.

As explained in Eutrophication and aquatic ecosystems, by Rosa Delgado, hypoxia can result from natural causes like heatwaves or algal blooms, but more often it is a consequence of poor management: overfeeding, overcrowding, waste accumulation, or poor filtration.

Signs of low oxygen in fish

Fish cannot speak, but they can signal distress in other ways:

  • Hanging near the surface where oxygen concentration is higher
  • Gulping at the surface (a clear sign of emergency)
  • Loss of appetite
  • Erratic or slow swimming
  • Clustered behavior around water inputs or filters

When these signs appear, immediate action is needed. The danger isn’t that the fish are sick from disease — it’s that they’re literally running out of breathable oxygen.

Yes, fish can suffocate

It might seem odd to say that fish — creatures that live and breathe in water — can suffocate. But it’s entirely accurate. Fish don’t die from lack of water; they die from lack of oxygen in that water. And because water holds so little oxygen to begin with, it doesn’t take much for things to go wrong.

According to Fishkeeping science and ethics, by Marina Solano, insufficient aeration is one of the top causes of sudden fish death in tanks and ponds. The gills simply cannot function without oxygen molecules in the surrounding water. It’s not unlike a human being trapped in an airless room — survival becomes impossible, no matter how much physical space remains.

Solutions to oxygen deficiency

There are many ways to ensure fish get the oxygen they need:

  • Water movement: The simplest solution is to increase surface agitation. This encourages gas exchange between air and water.
  • Aerators and bubblers: These devices pump air into the water, improving oxygen diffusion.
  • Live aquatic plants: During daylight hours, plants photosynthesize and produce oxygen.
  • Proper stocking levels: Overcrowding depletes oxygen faster than it can be replenished.
  • Good filtration: Filters that move water also increase oxygen levels indirectly.
  • Avoid overfeeding: Excess food decomposes and consumes oxygen.

These aren’t just best practices — they are essential steps for keeping aquatic systems healthy and breathable.

Air-breathing fish: evolutionary adaptations

Some species of fish have evolved to breathe air directly. This is an adaptation to oxygen-poor environments, especially stagnant or muddy waters.

  • Lungfish have actual lung-like organs and can survive out of water for extended periods.
  • Betta fish and gouramis possess a labyrinth organ that allows them to gulp air at the surface.
  • Certain catfish can absorb oxygen through their intestines or skin.

As outlined in Air-breathing fish: evolution and physiology, by Dr. Shereen Kumar, these adaptations are not optional luxuries — they’re critical survival tools for life in hostile, low-oxygen waters. But even these fish prefer water with oxygen and suffer when it’s lacking.

Why this knowledge matters

Dismissing the myths

Many aquarium hobbyists, aquaculture workers, and even educators underestimate how oxygen functions in aquatic life. The common myth is that as long as fish are in water, they’re fine. In reality, fish die every day from preventable hypoxia — often unnoticed until it’s too late.

Understanding how fish breathe is not just a matter of curiosity. It’s key to ethical treatment, successful aquaculture, and long-term health of aquatic systems.

It’s about biology, not ideology

There’s no need to resort to ideological narratives or speculative theories to grasp this concept. You don’t need to talk about carbon or temperature models. You just need to observe the simple biological fact: fish need oxygen. If water loses oxygen — through neglect, overuse, or stagnation — aquatic animals die.

That fact alone is enough reason to take it seriously.

Conclusion

Fish need oxygen just like any other animal — but they get it in a different way. Their gills are marvels of biological engineering, extracting dissolved oxygen from water with great efficiency. But that doesn’t make them invincible. When water becomes still, polluted, overstocked, or warm, oxygen levels fall. And fish, regardless of species, size, or toughness, suffer the consequences.

Recognizing this helps us keep fish alive — not through emotion or abstract rhetoric, but through respect for biology and basic responsibility.

The illusion of expertise: how fake coaches and influencers profit from empty promises

18 May 2025

In a digital age where algorithms reward attention over authenticity, an entire industry has emerged around the illusion of success. Self-proclaimed “coaches,” “mentors,” and “influencers” flood social media platforms with promises of transformation, passive income, and instant happiness. They offer courses, e-books, masterminds, and retreats—all supposedly built on their personal expertise. But more often than not, this expertise is fabricated, superficial, or entirely nonexistent.

These modern-day peddlers of advice rarely have credentials, experience, or demonstrable results. Instead, they rely on borrowed aesthetics, manipulative marketing, and emotionally loaded messaging to attract followers and convert them into paying customers. What began as a space for genuine knowledge sharing has, in many corners, devolved into a carefully crafted performance aimed at extracting money from the desperate, the insecure, and the hopeful.

Self-styled gurus exploit psychological vulnerabilities, and their business model is less about empowerment and more about manipulation and profiteering.

The rise of the self-proclaimed expert

Social media: a breeding ground for illusions

Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have democratized content creation, allowing anyone to build a platform and claim authority. While this has empowered many legitimate voices, it has also allowed individuals with no real experience to position themselves as experts.

The visual nature of these platforms is particularly conducive to image-based deception. A rented Lamborghini, a staged photo in Bali, or a paid-for testimonial can all be used to craft a compelling—but completely artificial—persona of success.

According to a study in the Journal of Marketing Research (Muntinga et al.), people are more likely to trust influencers they perceive as “authentic,” even when that perception is based on style and charisma rather than factual expertise. This illusion of relatability makes it easy for unqualified individuals to position themselves as role models or mentors.

Coaching as a low-barrier industry

Unlike regulated professions such as medicine, law, or even psychotherapy, anyone can call themselves a “life coach,” “business coach,” or “wellness expert” without credentials. There’s no central licensing body, no code of ethics, and no consumer protections in most jurisdictions. This lack of oversight is a key enabler of abuse.

Even platforms like Udemy or Teachable allow anyone to launch a course on topics ranging from financial independence to trauma healing. As noted by The Coaching Industry Uncovered (Ford), many of these courses are recycled content from other gurus, offering no original insights or tangible outcomes.

The psychological manipulation at play

Selling a dream, not a strategy

One of the most disturbing aspects of the coaching/influencer ecosystem is the deliberate targeting of vulnerable individuals—those in emotional distress, financial hardship, or transitional life phases. These are people looking for guidance and stability. What they get instead is a sales funnel.

The marketing strategies used by fake coaches are heavily based on emotional manipulation. They frame their content around “pain points” and offer testimonials that evoke envy and urgency. The promise is rarely concrete improvement but rather a vague sense of “breaking free,” “unlocking potential,” or “becoming your higher self.”

As described in the book The Confidence Game (Konnikova), con artists succeed not by outright deception but by mirroring the desires and fears of their targets. Many fake coaches use this same strategy, wrapping their schemes in the language of empowerment.

The “you just didn’t try hard enough” defense

When clients fail to achieve the promised results—because the systems sold to them were never realistic—they’re often told it’s their fault. They didn’t “do the work” or didn’t believe in themselves enough. This victim-blaming not only absolves the coach of responsibility but also manipulates clients into further investments.

This tactic is a classic hallmark of predatory behavior. It’s a psychological loop designed to make the victim doubt themselves while protecting the seller’s reputation.

How they build and protect the façade

Fake testimonials and social proof

Social proof is one of the most powerful tools in marketing. Fake coaches exploit this by manufacturing testimonials, inflating follower counts, and fabricating collaborations with real experts.

As reported in Fake Famous (Bilton), many influencers buy followers, likes, and even positive reviews to bolster their image. This makes it difficult for potential clients to distinguish between genuine and manufactured authority.

It’s also common for these individuals to feature each other in podcasts or testimonials, creating an incestuous echo chamber of validation. In reality, most have no experience outside of selling each other’s empty products.

The course-to-coach pipeline

A particularly insidious trend is that of people taking a fake coach’s course, learning the blueprint for selling, and then launching their own coaching business with no additional skills. This creates a pyramid-like structure where the product being sold is not expertise, but the process of selling coaching.

It’s a self-replicating system where the only measurable success is the ability to attract more customers. The core value—whether it be business knowledge, health advice, or emotional support—is secondary or entirely absent.

Real damage, real consequences

Financial and emotional exploitation

These schemes aren’t just harmless side hustles. Many people spend thousands on coaching packages, online courses, and retreats that yield no return. For someone struggling with mental health, unemployment, or isolation, this can be financially and emotionally devastating.

A report by The Guardian (Coaching scams cost thousands, author: Harrington) highlights multiple cases of individuals going into debt due to predatory coaching programs. In some instances, they were encouraged to take out loans or use credit cards to “invest in themselves.”

Misinformation and health risks

Perhaps most alarming are wellness coaches who offer nutritional or psychological advice without any training. From detox diets to trauma processing, they tread dangerously close to medical territory—without the education or safeguards to back it up.

The proliferation of such misinformation has been especially visible during the COVID-19 pandemic, where influencers without medical degrees promoted untested supplements or discouraged vaccination. This isn’t just unethical—it’s dangerous.

Why the system remains unchecked

Platforms profit from the illusion

Social media platforms have little incentive to moderate these practices. As long as content drives engagement and sales, it’s good for business. Many of these coaches spend heavily on advertising, further enriching the platforms that host them.

Moreover, legal accountability is rare. Because most fake coaches operate within vague self-help territory, it’s difficult to regulate or litigate against them. They offer “guidance,” not guarantees. And their terms and conditions are often crafted to avoid refunds or liability.

The cultural obsession with hustle and personal branding

A deeper problem is cultural. The rise of the self-coaching economy is tied to neoliberal ideals of personal responsibility and constant self-optimization. People are encouraged to invest in themselves, work harder, and never complain. If you fail, it’s because you didn’t try hard enough.

This creates fertile ground for exploiters. As explained in Selfie: How We Became So Self-Obsessed (Will Storr), the relentless focus on personal branding and hustle culture erodes community ties and makes people more susceptible to manipulative messages of self-reliance and hustle.

How to protect yourself and others

Look for real credentials

Anyone offering coaching or mentorship should be transparent about their background, education, and professional history. Real experts will usually be happy to explain their methods and provide evidence of their results.

Demand clarity and results

Vague promises of transformation without measurable goals are red flags. Ask for specific outcomes, timelines, and deliverables. If you’re given jargon instead of clear answers, walk away.

Share and expose

The silence around this issue enables its continuation. If you’ve had a negative experience with a fake coach, share your story. Public accountability is one of the few tools available to counter these practices.

Conclusion

The modern coaching and influencer industry is, in many cases, a well-packaged scam. It thrives on illusion, emotional manipulation, and the lack of regulation. While not all coaches are charlatans, the growing number of unqualified individuals exploiting vulnerable people for profit is a serious problem.

It’s time to question the culture that enables this deception. Real transformation doesn’t come from a $999 webinar or a glossy Instagram reel—it comes from hard work, real mentorship, and grounded expertise. Until we learn to value substance over spectacle, the grifters will continue to thrive.

Superfoods: nature’s most powerful ingredients for health and vitality

15 May 2025

What are superfoods?

Superfoods are foods that are exceptionally rich in essential nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, amino acids, fibers, and healthy fats. They support the body on multiple levels: from strengthening the immune system to enhancing brain function, cellular regeneration, digestion, and heart health. Many superfoods have been used for thousands of years in traditional medicine systems such as Ayurveda and Chinese medicine. These nutrient-dense foods not only provide basic nourishment but also actively contribute to preventing chronic diseases, improving energy levels, and restoring balance in the body. By integrating a variety of superfoods into daily meals, one can benefit from a broader spectrum of bioactive substances and protective compounds that work synergistically for optimal vitality.

Fruits and berries

Blueberries

Blueberries are rich in antioxidants, particularly anthocyanins, which help reduce inflammation and protect brain cells from oxidative stress. They are linked to improved memory and learning ability, and they can also help reduce blood pressure and protect against cardiovascular diseases. These small berries also contain fiber, vitamin K, and manganese.

Açaí berries

Originating from the Amazon rainforest, açaí berries are rich in healthy fats, especially omega-9 and omega-6, and contain powerful antioxidants that help neutralize free radicals. Their high ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) value makes them ideal for combating oxidative stress and promoting youthful skin and immune health.

Goji berries

Goji berries are a traditional superfood in Chinese medicine. They are rich in vitamin C, beta-carotene, iron, and zeaxanthin, which supports eye health. Goji berries also help regulate blood sugar, support the liver, and enhance energy levels.

Pomegranate

Pomegranate seeds contain polyphenols such as punicalagins and anthocyanins, which have strong anti-inflammatory effects and support heart health. The juice contributes to lowering blood pressure and may help prevent certain types of cancer.

Camu Camu

Camu Camu is one of the richest natural sources of vitamin C. This small Amazonian fruit helps strengthen the immune system, reduce inflammation, and improve collagen production for skin and joints. It also supports mood through the presence of amino acids like valine and leucine.

Maqui berries

Maqui berries contain even more antioxidants than blueberries or açaí. They are especially rich in delphinidins, which reduce oxidative stress and inflammation. Maqui berries also improve insulin sensitivity and support blood sugar regulation, making them particularly valuable for people with metabolic disorders.

Acerola cherry

Acerola cherries are among the most concentrated natural sources of vitamin C. They contain phytonutrients such as carotenoids and flavonoids that enhance the immune system, fight infections, and protect cells from oxidative damage. They also support the production of collagen for healthy skin and joints.

Vegetables and plants

Spirulina

Spirulina is a blue-green algae loaded with plant-based proteins, iron, B vitamins, chlorophyll, and antioxidants. It boosts the immune system, detoxifies heavy metals from the body, supports healthy blood formation, and enhances endurance and recovery in athletes.

Chlorella

Chlorella is a green microalgae with potent detoxifying effects, especially for heavy metals like mercury and lead. It contains chlorophyll, vitamin B12, and growth factors that promote tissue regeneration and cellular repair. Regular intake also supports intestinal flora and immune health.

Kale

Kale is a cruciferous vegetable rich in vitamin K, vitamin C, vitamin A, lutein, and fiber. It helps regulate cholesterol, supports liver function, and contributes to strong bones and a healthy cardiovascular system. The sulfur compounds in kale also aid in detoxification.

Spinach

Spinach is a leafy green high in iron, magnesium, folate, and lutein. It promotes red blood cell production, supports eye health, and contributes to proper muscle and nerve function. Its antioxidants protect against oxidative damage and inflammation.

Watercress

Often underestimated, watercress is rich in antioxidants and sulfur compounds that support liver detoxification. It contains glucosinolates that stimulate phase II liver enzymes and help neutralize harmful toxins. Watercress also has anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects.

Seaweed (nori, wakame, kombu)

Seaweed is an excellent source of iodine, calcium, iron, and polysaccharides that support thyroid function, metabolic balance, and immune response. The alginates in seaweed bind to toxins in the digestive system, aiding detoxification. Seaweed also has antiviral properties.

Broccoli sprouts

Broccoli sprouts contain up to 100 times more sulforaphane than mature broccoli. Sulforaphane is a powerful compound that activates the body’s detoxification enzymes, reduces inflammation, and provides protective effects against certain types of cancer. They are easy to grow and potent in small amounts.

Roots, seeds, and grains

Maca root

Maca is a root from the Andes that supports hormonal balance, increases libido, and improves energy and stamina. It contains adaptogens that help the body cope with stress, as well as essential amino acids and minerals like zinc and iron. Maca is often used to support fertility and hormonal health in both men and women.

Ginger

Ginger contains gingerol, a compound with powerful anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. It improves digestion, reduces nausea, and stimulates circulation. Ginger also helps reduce muscle pain, arthritis symptoms, and supports the immune system during colds and infections.

Turmeric

Turmeric is known for its main active compound, curcumin, which has strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Curcumin protects brain cells, supports liver function, and has potential in treating inflammatory diseases, depression, and even certain cancers.

Black cumin seed

Black cumin seed (Nigella sativa) contains thymoquinone, a powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compound. It strengthens the immune system, supports blood sugar control, and protects the liver and kidneys. It is also used in the treatment of asthma and allergies.

Flaxseed

Flaxseed is rich in alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), a plant-based omega-3 fatty acid, and lignans, which have antioxidant and hormone-regulating effects. Flaxseed improves digestion, supports heart health, and helps regulate estrogen levels, which can be beneficial for women during menopause.

Chia seeds

Chia seeds are high in fiber, plant-based omega-3s, and minerals such as calcium and magnesium. They help stabilize blood sugar, support hydration, and promote satiety, making them ideal for weight control and energy maintenance.

Hemp seeds

Hemp seeds contain all nine essential amino acids and are rich in omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in the optimal ratio. They promote heart health, support the skin and brain, and strengthen the immune system. They are a complete protein source for vegetarians and vegans.

Quinoa

Quinoa is a gluten-free grain rich in proteins, fiber, magnesium, iron, and B vitamins. It contains all essential amino acids and has a low glycemic index. It supports blood sugar regulation, muscle recovery, and a balanced diet.

Animal-based superfoods

Wild salmon

Wild salmon is one of the richest natural sources of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA), which support brain function, reduce inflammation, and protect heart and vascular health. It also provides high-quality protein, vitamin D, and selenium, all important for strong bones, a healthy immune system, and hormonal balance.

Sardines

Sardines are small, fatty fish full of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin B12, and omega-3s. They are excellent for bone strength, heart health, and cognitive function. Because they are low on the food chain, they contain fewer heavy metals than larger fish species.

Eggs (from pasture-raised chickens)

Eggs are a complete protein source and rich in choline, lutein, zeaxanthin, and vitamin D. Choline supports brain development and function, while lutein and zeaxanthin protect the eyes from age-related degeneration. Pasture-raised eggs contain more omega-3s and vitamins than conventional eggs.

Organ meats (e.g., liver)

Liver, especially beef or chicken liver, is one of the most nutrient-dense foods on the planet. It contains high levels of vitamin A, iron, copper, B12, folate, and zinc. These nutrients support energy production, immune defense, blood formation, and detoxification.

Bone broth

Bone broth is made by simmering animal bones and connective tissue for an extended time, releasing collagen, gelatin, amino acids like glycine and proline, and minerals. It strengthens joints, gut lining, and skin, and supports healthy digestion and recovery.

Functional drinks and powders

Raw cacao

Raw cacao is the unprocessed form of chocolate, rich in flavonoids, magnesium, iron, and natural mood enhancers like anandamide. It supports cardiovascular health, improves blood flow to the brain, and enhances mood and focus.

Matcha

Matcha is a finely ground powder of specially grown green tea leaves. It contains high concentrations of catechins, particularly EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), known for its powerful antioxidant and cancer-preventing properties. It supports metabolism, mental focus, and provides sustained energy without a crash.

Reishi mushroom

Reishi is a medicinal mushroom used in traditional Chinese medicine for its immune-regulating, anti-inflammatory, and adaptogenic properties. It helps the body cope with stress, reduces fatigue, and promotes calm and restorative sleep.

Chaga mushroom

Chaga grows on birch trees and is incredibly rich in antioxidants, especially melanin and polyphenols. It supports the immune system, reduces inflammation, and protects against oxidative stress. Chaga also has antiviral and detoxifying properties.

Ashwagandha

Ashwagandha is an adaptogenic herb that reduces cortisol levels and helps combat stress, anxiety, and fatigue. It improves sleep quality, boosts testosterone levels, and enhances memory and mental focus. It is widely used in Ayurvedic medicine.

Ginseng

Ginseng is known for its energy-boosting and immune-enhancing effects. It improves physical and mental performance, increases resistance to stress, and supports blood sugar control. There are several types, including Panax (Asian) and American ginseng, each with slightly different effects.

Kombucha

Kombucha is a fermented tea drink rich in probiotics, enzymes, and organic acids. It improves gut flora, supports digestion, and boosts immunity. The fermentation process also produces beneficial compounds like glucuronic acid, which aids in liver detoxification.

Aloe vera

Aloe vera contains enzymes, vitamins A, C, E, and B12, as well as anti-inflammatory compounds like salicylic acid. Internally, it supports digestion and gut health. Externally, it soothes and heals the skin. Aloe is also known for its immune-modulating properties.

Bee products

Manuka honey

Manuka honey from New Zealand contains methylglyoxal (MGO), which gives it powerful antibacterial, antiviral, and wound-healing properties. It supports the immune system, soothes sore throats, and promotes healing of skin infections and wounds.

Propolis

Propolis is a resinous substance made by bees from plant resins. It has strong antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects. It supports oral health, speeds wound healing, and strengthens immune defense.

Bee pollen

Bee pollen is a natural superfood that contains proteins, enzymes, B-vitamins, antioxidants, and phytonutrients. It boosts energy, enhances stamina, supports the immune system, and promotes recovery after physical exertion.

Conclusion

Superfoods are not magical cures, but they form an essential part of a nutrient-rich diet that supports long-term health and vitality. They offer concentrated nutrients, antioxidants, and bioactive compounds that strengthen the body at cellular level, reduce inflammation, and promote optimal function of the brain, heart, immune system, and digestion.

By incorporating a variety of superfoods from both plant and animal sources, one can benefit from a broad spectrum of health-promoting substances. It is crucial to choose whole, minimally processed forms and to pay attention to origin, purity, and preparation method to ensure the highest nutrient value.

Superfoods can enrich any diet, but they work best when they are part of an overall healthy lifestyle with sufficient sleep, physical activity, stress management, and social connection. Those who want to use food as preventive or even healing medicine will find in these superfoods a powerful and natural toolkit.

By consciously choosing nutrient-dense foods instead of empty calories, we not only feed our bodies, but also our minds — and perhaps our future.

The Law as a Weapon: How Rules and Regulations Block Progress and Consolidate Power

12 May 2025

Laws and regulations are supposed to form the backbone of a functioning society. In theory, they serve to ensure justice, protect freedom, and prevent abuse of power. But what happens when those very laws and rules betray their original purpose? When regulation no longer protects citizens but instead shields the elites? When laws become so complex, contradictory, and selectively enforced that they paralyze decision-making, stifle innovation, and concentrate power in fewer and fewer hands?

In today’s era of overregulation, technocratic control, and bureaucratic expansion, it’s becoming increasingly clear that laws are serving the system rather than the people. From EU directives to American federal laws, from pandemic restrictions to environmental mandates — the pattern is the same: the law has stopped being a shield and has become a sword. Laws and regulations have lost their way, governments and their networks exploit them for control, what does this mean for freedom, innovation, and justice?

The paradox of rules: protection as restriction

The bureaucratic stranglehold

French philosopher Montesquieu warned that power always expands unless it is restrained. Laws should provide that restraint. But what happens when laws themselves become tools of power expansion?

In modern democracies, laws and rules have become so complex that only specialized lawyers and civil servants can understand them. This creates a “legal caste” that holds real power — not the citizens, and often not even their elected representatives. This process is known as “bureaucratic centralization”: a system in which the executive branch writes, interprets, and enforces its own rules, often outside of democratic oversight (The Administrative Threat, Philip Hamburger).

Thus, laws are no longer written to prevent abuse but to distribute power within networks of political and corporate interests. Every “problem” demands a “rule,” which then legitimizes new forms of control. This leads to an exponential growth of rules that don’t offer solutions but mainly serve to make action impossible without bureaucratic permission.

The illusion of equality

One of the cornerstones of the rule of law is the principle of equality: the same rules for everyone. In practice, however, we see more and more selective enforcement. Large corporations employ armies of lawyers and lobbyists to help write the rules and secure exemptions. Citizens and small businesses are left behind in a maze of regulation that paralyzes them economically and leaves them legally defenseless.

Tax law is a clear example. Multinationals use complex fiscal constructions — often legal — to avoid taxes, while ordinary citizens must account for every cent (The Triumph of Injustice, Saez & Zucman). The law is formally equal but materially extremely unequal.

The law as a tool of power

Lawmaking in response to crises

Over the past decades, major legislative shifts haven’t come from democratic debate, but as reactions to crises: the 9/11 attacks, the 2008 financial collapse, the COVID-19 pandemic, and more recently, the “climate emergency.” Every time, a state of emergency is declared, and in the name of safety or health, far-reaching laws are imposed that severely restrict fundamental freedoms.

As Naomi Klein describes in The Shock Doctrine, governments use disasters — real or manufactured — to push through measures that would be unacceptable under normal circumstances. The Patriot Act (2001) gave the U.S. government unprecedented surveillance powers. COVID measures like lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and curfews were imposed in many countries through emergency laws with little or no parliamentary scrutiny (State of Exception, Giorgio Agamben).

Overregulation as a weapon against competition and innovation

Rules are often portrayed as “neutral,” but in reality, they function as barriers for new entrants. Large firms have the capital and legal teams to comply with thousands of pages of regulation — start-ups and citizens do not. In sectors like healthcare, energy, education, and agriculture, rules are not used to reduce risk, but to block competition.

In The Utopia of Rules, David Graeber argues that modern bureaucracy doesn’t fail despite its rules but because of them: rules are designed to allow endless exceptions and interpretations. Those who have access to these exceptions (through connections or money) hold power — those who follow the rules are silenced.

Laws and corruption: the invisible alliance

From public protection to private interests

Much regulation does not stem from a concern for the public good but from lobbying. Major industrial players help draft legislation, influence enforcement, and place their own people in oversight bodies. This phenomenon — known as “regulatory capture” — means that institutions meant to oversee industries are in fact controlled by the industries themselves (Capture: Unraveling the Mystery of Regulatory Failure, Daniel Carpenter).

A well-known example is the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration), where officials frequently transition to jobs in the pharmaceutical industry and vice versa. This “revolving door” system leads to massive conflicts of interest. Those who pay, rule.

The creation of legal networks

The power of regulation lies not only in the laws themselves but in the networks they create: webs of institutions, commissions, experts, lawyers, inspectors, consultants, and lobbyists who “bring the law to life.” These networks operate as self-reinforcing ecosystems. They create their own jargon, procedures, and moral universe. Outsiders have little access or influence.

In Europe, this is clearly visible in the EU, where thousands of regulations and directives are drafted without direct democratic input. The European Court of Justice holds powers that overrule national courts. National governments then hide behind “Brussels,” claiming they have no choice. Political accountability disappears — law becomes an anonymous, uncontrollable force.

Consequences for society and progress

Paralysis of decision-making

When every decision must first be checked against hundreds of rules, procedures, permits, and review frameworks, the ability to act quickly and decisively disappears. Innovation slows down, infrastructure projects are stalled for years, and the public sector drowns in its own paperwork.

A clear example is housing in the Netherlands, where nitrogen laws, environmental requirements, and appeal procedures delay every project by years. Citizens pay the price: sky-high rents, housing shortages, and a loss of trust in government.

Criminalization of the citizen

The more rules exist, the more likely it is that everyone unknowingly breaks some of them. Law becomes less a guideline than a trap. This leads to what legal scholars call “overcriminalization”: the existence of so many laws that it’s impossible to comply with them all (Three Felonies a Day, Harvey Silverglate). As a result, the state always has a legal pretext to punish a citizen — if politically or economically convenient.

This creates an atmosphere of fear and conformity. People hesitate to take initiative, fearing legal consequences. Freedom becomes an illusion: you are free as long as you don’t stand out.

Conclusion: the law must serve the people again

Modern laws and regulations are not neutral, fair, or service-oriented. They are designed, manipulated, and applied by a technocratic elite that protects its own interests. What was once meant to limit power has become a system that legitimizes, extends, and consolidates it.

If we want to restore freedom, innovation, and public accountability, laws must be redesigned — not as instruments of control, but as protections of autonomy and common sense. This requires a cultural shift: from overregulation to trust, from legal hierarchy to democratic participation, from networked power to individual responsibility.

Laws must serve citizens, not the system. Only when we recognize this simple truth can we begin the liberation of law itself.

Sources

  • The Administrative Threat, Philip Hamburger
  • The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein
  • State of Exception, Giorgio Agamben
  • The Triumph of Injustice, Gabriel Zucman & Emmanuel Saez
  • The Utopia of Rules, David Graeber
  • Capture: Unraveling the Mystery of Regulatory Failure, Daniel Carpenter
  • Three Felonies a Day, Harvey Silverglate

The Reckoning of a Nation: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Battle for a Healthier America

6 May 2025

Few figures in contemporary American politics have ignited as much passionate debate — and as much resistance from the establishment — as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. A member of the storied Kennedy family, RFK Jr. has stepped away from traditional party lines to wage a tireless battle against what he sees as the deeply entrenched power of corporate pharmaceutical interests and their government allies. In a nation increasingly suffering from chronic illness, mistrust in public health institutions, and skyrocketing healthcare costs, Kennedy’s voice has become a clarion call for accountability, transparency, and a return to health policies grounded in real science and citizen welfare — not corporate profit.

Let’s explore Kennedy’s biography, his relentless fight against Big Pharma and the vaccine industry, and his vision for restoring American health sovereignty.

The Kennedy Legacy: A Different Path

A Political Name With a Legal Mind

Born in 1954, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the son of U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy. Raised in a family synonymous with American politics and public service, RFK Jr. carved out his own niche early in life, not in Washington but in the courtroom. After graduating from Harvard and earning a law degree from the University of Virginia, he became an environmental attorney and activist. His legal work with the non-profit Riverkeeper and the Natural Resources Defense Council marked him as a defender of the public good, taking on polluters and corrupt institutions head-on.

His early legal battles showed a pattern that would define his later work: a refusal to be intimidated by powerful industries and a commitment to exposing systemic corruption. But it wasn’t until the early 2000s that Kennedy would turn his attention to an industry even more powerful than polluting corporations: the pharmaceutical and vaccine complex.

Exposing the Pharmaceutical Cartel

The Vaccine Industry: Shielded From Accountability

Kennedy began speaking out against vaccine safety and Big Pharma’s unchecked influence after reading about the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, still found in some vaccines. He was shocked by what he discovered: evidence of collusion between pharmaceutical companies and government agencies to cover up vaccine risks, suppress dissenting research, and mislead the public.

In his book Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak (Kennedy), he compiles scientific studies that raise serious concerns about the neurological effects of thimerosal in infants and children. Rather than being engaged in a debate, Kennedy was vilified — branded an “anti-vaxxer” despite repeatedly stating he is not against vaccines, but against unsafe vaccines and the lack of proper safety testing.

According to data presented in The Real Anthony Fauci (Kennedy), the vaccine industry enjoys legal protections unlike any other. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act granted vaccine makers blanket immunity from lawsuits, meaning that even if a vaccine causes harm, the manufacturer cannot be held accountable in court. Instead, victims must appeal to a government-run tribunal known as “Vaccine Court.” This system has quietly paid out billions in damages, yet it has received little media attention (The Vaccine Court, Holland).

Fauci, Gates, and the Machinery of Control

Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci is perhaps his most explosive work to date. In it, he argues that Dr. Anthony Fauci, long-time head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, orchestrated a system in which pharmaceutical companies and government agencies operate in lockstep — funded by taxpayer money but driven by private profit. Fauci, according to Kennedy, used public health as a weapon of control, pushing untested and often dangerous products while suppressing generic, low-cost treatments that posed no profit incentive for Big Pharma (The Real Anthony Fauci, Kennedy).

Bill Gates is another figure Kennedy scrutinizes in detail. As he writes, Gates has transformed himself into an unelected public health czar, using his massive wealth to steer global vaccine agendas via organizations like Gavi and the WHO. According to Kennedy, this marriage of philanthropy and corporate interest has created a feedback loop in which Gates invests in vaccine companies, funds global health institutions, and then profits from the very products those institutions promote (Vax-Unvax, Kennedy).

Chronic Disease and America’s Health Collapse

From Autism to Autoimmune Disorders

One of Kennedy’s most dire warnings is the explosion of chronic disease in American children. In the 1960s, roughly 6% of American children had a chronic health condition. Today, over 54% do, including autism, ADHD, asthma, food allergies, and autoimmune disorders (Children’s Health Defense, Kennedy).

He argues that vaccines and environmental toxins are a major, though largely ignored, contributor to this crisis. In a rational society, such claims would trigger an investigation, yet in America, they trigger censorship. Facebook, YouTube, and even Amazon have all removed content associated with Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense organization, often citing “misinformation” — without engaging with the actual science presented.

Yet the studies Kennedy cites are not fringe. He draws upon peer-reviewed literature, government databases, and whistleblower testimony to build his case. His critics often refuse to debate the substance of his arguments, preferring character assassination to scientific discourse.

The Role of Censorship

Kennedy’s experience during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores a disturbing new normal: dissent from the pharmaceutical consensus is no longer allowed in public discourse. His interviews have been deplatformed, books shadow-banned, and organizations defunded by platforms beholden to the very corporations he critiques.

In Letter to Liberals (Kennedy), he highlights the hypocrisy of left-leaning institutions that once championed free speech, bodily autonomy, and skepticism of corporate power — only to abandon those principles under the banner of pandemic emergency. The silencing of medical professionals, alternative researchers, and even vaccine-injured families is a form of ideological fascism, according to Kennedy, one that prioritizes compliance over truth.

A Presidential Bid Rooted in Accountability

Breaking with Party Lines

In 2023, RFK Jr. announced his candidacy for president as a Democrat but soon shifted to an Independent ticket, recognizing that the modern Democratic Party was no longer a vehicle for real reform. His campaign has prioritized restoring constitutional freedoms, dismantling the corporate capture of public institutions, and exposing the economic devastation wrought by pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

Unlike other candidates, Kennedy has refused to take donations from pharmaceutical companies or lobbyists. His platform is built on decentralization — of power, of health decisions, and of information. He opposes digital ID systems, CBDCs (central bank digital currencies), and other technologies he views as tools of surveillance and control, often echoing themes found in Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order (Wood).

Making America Healthy Again

Kennedy’s campaign slogan — “Heal the Divide” — is not just about political partisanship. It’s about the divide between corporate propaganda and public truth, between institutional betrayal and citizen empowerment. He calls for:

  • Independent vaccine safety testing;
  • Removing liability shields from pharmaceutical companies;
  • Investigating the CDC, NIH, and FDA for conflicts of interest;
  • Banning censorship on public health topics;
  • Rebuilding health from the ground up — through clean water, healthy food, and environmental restoration.

He also speaks frequently about restoring trust in medicine by eliminating financial incentives that distort medical judgment. As noted in Overdosed America (Abramson), many physicians unknowingly prescribe drugs based on manipulated data from pharmaceutical-funded trials. Kennedy wants to break this cycle by enforcing transparency and ethical standards in medical research.

Legacy, Courage, and the Future of Freedom

The Last Kennedy Rebel

RFK Jr. stands nearly alone among political figures in his willingness to confront the pharmaceutical-industrial complex. For that, he has paid a high price: public vilification, media blackouts, and even threats of assassination. Yet he remains undeterred.

His courage recalls that of his father, Robert F. Kennedy, who in 1968 was assassinated while campaigning for a nation tired of war, lies, and corruption. The younger Kennedy now wages a similar battle — not against a foreign war, but a domestic one: the war for control over our bodies, our children, and our truth.

As he says in The Real Anthony Fauci (Kennedy): “We are standing in the shadow of a new totalitarianism, dressed in the garb of public health.” Whether one agrees with all of Kennedy’s positions or not, his warnings demand scrutiny, not silence.

Conclusion

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. represents a rare kind of political figure: principled, informed, and unafraid. His work to expose the dangers of corporate control in public health is not only timely but essential. America is facing a crisis of chronic illness, institutional distrust, and pharmaceutical dependency — and Kennedy is one of the few voices offering a way out.

If we are to become a healthy nation again, it will require more than just policy changes. It will require a reckoning — with the lies we’ve accepted, the institutions we’ve trusted, and the silence we’ve tolerated. RFK Jr. is calling that reckoning by name. And whether he wins the presidency or not, his campaign may go down as one of the most important truth-telling missions of our time.

References

  • Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • The Real Anthony Fauci, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • The Vaccine Court, Mary Holland
  • Children’s Health Defense, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • Letter to Liberals, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • Overdosed America, John Abramson
  • Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, Patrick M. Wood

The surprising history of the Carbonara dish

4 May 2025

Spaghetti alla Carbonara is a dish that evokes comfort, simplicity, and tradition. With its creamy texture, rich flavor, and humble ingredients, Carbonara has become a symbol of Italian culinary excellence across the globe. But behind its delicious taste lies a surprisingly complex and debated history. Contrary to the popular belief that it is an ancient Italian classic, Carbonara’s roots are relatively modern—and international in flavor. This article delves into the origin stories, culinary evolution, cultural context, and eventual canonization of Carbonara, revealing how war, migration, and myth-making have all played a part.

Origins of the name

The etymology of “Carbonara”

The term Carbonara is derived from the Italian word carbonaro, which translates to “charcoal burner.” One theory posits that the dish was named after coal miners in the Apennine mountains who allegedly ate a version of it as a practical, filling meal (title La cucina romana, author Ada Boni). The black pepper in the dish was thought to resemble coal dust—a poetic and rustic image.

However, no written record of the recipe appears before the 1940s. This challenges the theory that it was an old peasant or miner’s dish. Food historians argue that if such a dish were widely known among laborers, it would have appeared in Italy’s rich culinary archives much earlier.

A secret society?

Another speculative origin links Carbonara to the Carbonari, a 19th-century secret revolutionary society in Italy. Some believe the dish may have been created or named in homage to them. Yet this idea is more mythological than historical and lacks concrete evidence (title A History of Italian Food, author Alberto Capatti).

The post-war invention theory

American soldiers and powdered eggs

The most widely accepted theory attributes Carbonara’s invention to the period following World War II. In 1944, Allied troops, particularly Americans, were stationed in Italy. They brought with them rations that included powdered eggs and bacon. Italian chefs, coping with post-war food scarcity, are believed to have improvised a pasta dish using these ingredients, giving birth to the earliest version of Carbonara (title Delizia!, author John Dickie).

According to Dickie, it is no coincidence that Carbonara first appeared in cookbooks around this time. The combination of bacon and eggs was alien to traditional Roman cuisine but familiar to Americans. The fusion of these culinary traditions represents a case of food as cultural exchange under extreme historical conditions.

The first written recipe

The first published recipe appeared in 1954 in La Cucina Italiana, a prestigious Italian food magazine. Interestingly, the recipe used spaghetti, eggs, pancetta, Parmesan cheese, and garlic—elements now associated with the dish but with some differences from today’s purist versions (title La Cucina Italiana, author Editoriale Domus). Notably, cream, often used outside of Italy today, was absent.

Evolution of the ingredients

Guanciale vs pancetta

While many modern interpretations use pancetta, traditional Roman Carbonara relies on guanciale—cured pork jowl. Guanciale has a stronger, richer flavor and a higher fat content, which melts into the sauce, giving it depth. This shift reflects a return to regional authenticity as Italian cuisine underwent a renaissance in the 1970s and 1980s, promoting local ingredients (title La cucina romana, author Ada Boni).

Pecorino Romano vs Parmesan

Another key debate centers on cheese. Parmesan (Parmigiano Reggiano) is often used outside Italy, but true Carbonara calls for Pecorino Romano. The sharp, salty flavor of this sheep’s cheese complements the fat of the guanciale and the richness of the egg.

Eggs: yolk or whole?

Recipes vary widely when it comes to eggs. Some call for whole eggs, others for only yolks. The yolk-only versions produce a richer, creamier sauce. Purists insist that no cream should ever be added—the creaminess should come from the emulsion of egg, cheese, and pork fat (title Science in the Kitchen and the Art of Eating Well, author Pellegrino Artusi).

International misinterpretations

The addition of cream

In the United States and the UK, it is common to find Carbonara recipes that include heavy cream. While this may appeal to international palates, it is sacrilege to Italian chefs. According to the Italian Academy of Cuisine, adding cream betrays the dish’s essence, which relies on emulsion, not dairy (title Italian Food: Fact and Fiction, author Gillian Riley).

Carbonara with mushrooms, peas, or chicken

The further globalization of Carbonara has led to countless variants—some with mushrooms, others with peas, even with chicken or shrimp. While these dishes may be enjoyable in their own right, they are no longer considered Carbonara in the traditional sense. In 2020, Italians reacted with outrage to a French version of Carbonara shared by the French government’s food channel that included crème fraîche and onions (title Carbonara-gate, author La Repubblica).

Carbonara’s rise to iconic status

From Rome to the world

Spaghetti alla Carbonara has become one of the most famous Italian dishes globally, alongside pizza and lasagna. It represents the Roman tradition, but its post-war American connection gives it a dual identity. Tourists seek it out in Trastevere, while chefs around the world attempt to replicate its perfection.

Carbonara Day

In 2017, the Italian pasta manufacturers’ association declared April 6th as “Carbonara Day,” a social media celebration of the dish. Each year, Italians and enthusiasts worldwide share their Carbonara creations online, igniting debates about authenticity and innovation (title La Repubblica, author Silvia Cittadini).

Culinary symbolism

A dish of transition

Carbonara stands as a metaphor for Italy’s transition from war to modernity. It captures a moment in time when Italians, faced with hardship, adapted and created something new from limited means. It also mirrors the broader trajectory of Italian food: from regional necessity to global obsession.

Purity vs evolution

The dish raises a philosophical question often debated in culinary circles: should traditional recipes evolve with time and context, or must they be preserved in their original forms? Carbonara occupies the middle ground—a recipe born of innovation that has since become fiercely protected by tradition.

Conclusion

The story of Carbonara is not simply about food—it is about history, identity, and the intersection of cultures. It began, not in a medieval Roman kitchen, but amidst the rubble and rations of post-WWII Italy. It evolved as Italian chefs incorporated foreign ingredients into their culinary repertoire, turning an improvisation into an iconic dish. Today, it is both deeply local and unmistakably global.

The debates around authenticity reflect broader tensions in culture and heritage. Is it acceptable to adapt traditional recipes to suit modern tastes, or should they remain untouched? Carbonara, in all its creamy, peppery glory, suggests that the best dishes are those that tell a story—of change, resilience, and, above all, taste.

Recipe: Spaghetti alla Carbonara

Ingredients

  • 400 grams of spaghetti
  • 150 grams of guanciale (or pancetta as an alternative)
  • 4 egg yolks
  • 100 grams of Pecorino Romano, finely grated
  • Black pepper, freshly ground
  • Salt

Instructions

  1. Cook the pasta
    Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil. Cook the spaghetti until al dente according to package instructions.
  2. Prepare the guanciale
    Cut the guanciale into strips or cubes. Fry it in a skillet over medium-low heat without oil until golden brown and crispy. Remove from heat but keep the rendered fat.
  3. Beat the egg mixture
    In a bowl, mix the egg yolks with the grated Pecorino Romano and a generous amount of black pepper until it forms a thick cream.
  4. Combine
    Drain the pasta (save a bit of the cooking water). Add the pasta to the pan with the guanciale and mix. Quickly add the egg mixture while stirring continuously. Add a small amount of pasta water if the sauce is too thick to keep it creamy. The heat of the pasta gently cooks the eggs without scrambling them.
  5. Serve
    Serve immediately with extra Pecorino and black pepper to taste.

Enjoy your meal!

The Illusion of Glory: How the Nobel Prize Became a Political Instrument

3 May 2025

Once revered as the pinnacle of global recognition for scientific, literary, and humanitarian excellence, the Nobel Prize has gradually devolved into a stage for ideological favoritism, Western moral posturing, and soft power diplomacy. While Alfred Nobel’s testament called for awards to be given to those who “have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind,” modern recipients are often chosen in ways that reflect strategic narratives more than genuine merit.

Particularly the Peace, Literature, and Economic prizes, have betrayed its founding vision by consistently rewarding political alignment, cultural dominance, and globalist orthodoxy — often at the expense of true progress, dissent, and diversity.

A myth of moral superiority

The ideal vs. the reality

Alfred Nobel’s vision was one of apolitical recognition. Yet, every institution tasked with administering these prizes is embedded within a national and ideological context. The Norwegian Nobel Committee, for example, is appointed by the Norwegian parliament — a NATO member — while the Swedish Academy that handles the literature prize has long been accused of elitism and internal scandal (Nobel Scandal Erupts in Sweden, New York Times).

Despite lofty language about impartiality, neutrality, and global unity, the Nobel system rewards compliance with Western narratives far more often than radical innovation or independent moral courage. This is especially visible in the Peace and Literature categories, where ambiguity and moral selectiveness reign.

The Nobel Peace Prize: politics in disguise

Barack Obama’s preemptive peace

Perhaps the most notorious example of ideological projection over achievement is the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to U.S. President Barack Obama. Having been in office for less than a year and with no peace deals under his belt, Obama received the prize for promoting a “new climate in international politics” (Why Obama Won the Nobel Peace Prize, The Nobel Committee).

This premature accolade overlooked his immediate expansion of drone warfare, the continuation of Bush-era surveillance programs, and eventual interventions in Libya and Syria. The justification of his award rested not on outcomes but aspirations — an overt signal of the Prize’s transformation into a moral investment rather than a recognition of achievement (The Drone Papers, The Intercept).

War criminals turned peacemakers?

More troubling is the historical pattern of awarding the Peace Prize to statesmen with controversial legacies. Henry Kissinger received the Nobel in 1973 despite having orchestrated coups and wars in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Chile. The award was so scandalous that two members of the Nobel Committee resigned in protest (The Case Against Henry Kissinger, Christopher Hitchens).

Others, such as Yasser Arafat, Menachem Begin, and even the European Union itself (2012), received the Peace Prize not for lasting peace but for politically symbolic efforts. That EU award came at a time of deepening economic hardship across Southern Europe, following austerity measures imposed by Northern European states. Peace, in these instances, seems to mean “stability on Western terms,” regardless of the actual human cost.

The glaring absence of whistleblowers

The Peace Prize’s ideological slant is perhaps most evident in who doesn’t receive it. Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, and Edward Snowden have each exposed massive state abuses and triggered global debates about war, surveillance, and freedom. Yet, none have been honored — likely because their revelations indict the very powers the Nobel system tends to flatter. Recognition of such individuals would demand genuine moral courage from the committee, which is consistently lacking (The Nobel Peace Prize Is Political, Glenn Greenwald).

Literature as cultural imperialism

A Eurocentric echo chamber

Of the over 120 Nobel laureates in literature, more than 80% have been from Europe or North America. African, Asian, and Latin American voices remain significantly underrepresented — and when they are included, it is often those who adopt Western literary forms or express Western-approved political critique (The Nobel Prize in Literature: Eurocentrism and Bias, Le Monde Diplomatique).

The committee’s idea of “universal literature” is deeply rooted in Western notions of individualism, humanism, and secularism. Writers who diverge from these paradigms or who criticize Western hegemony rarely find favor, regardless of their literary brilliance.

The pop-culture turn: Bob Dylan

In 2016, the Nobel Committee stunned the literary world by awarding the prize to Bob Dylan, a musician. While his lyrics are celebrated in American culture, many questioned whether they could be equated with literature in the traditional sense. Critics argued that this choice cheapened the literary award and pandered to cultural populism (Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature, The Guardian).

The Dylan award marked a turning point: the Literature Prize became less about intellectual depth and more about media resonance. Meanwhile, novelists and poets producing groundbreaking work in less globally dominant languages continue to be ignored.

The scientific prizes: excellence, but not equity

Recognition gaps and gender bias

Though science prizes are perceived as more objective, they too reflect systemic bias. The restriction to only three recipients per prize often results in the exclusion of key contributors, especially women and researchers from developing countries. The case of Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray images were instrumental to the discovery of DNA’s structure, remains one of the most cited injustices in Nobel history (Rosalind Franklin and DNA, Brenda Maddox).

Similarly, pioneering work in climate science or renewable energy has often been overshadowed by more traditional physics and chemistry fields, suggesting a conservative bias in what the committee deems “prize-worthy.”

Geopolitics in scientific prestige

During the Cold War, Soviet scientists were systematically overlooked. Today, Chinese researchers face similar marginalization. As global scientific leadership shifts eastward, the Nobel’s reluctance to acknowledge these contributions suggests it still functions within a Western ideological framework (The Politics of Science Awards, Nature).

Even in medicine, many laureates hail from elite Western institutions, often building upon data and fieldwork gathered in the Global South — a pattern some describe as “intellectual colonialism.”

The Prize in Economics: capitalism’s sacred cow

A fake Nobel?

The “Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel” was established in 1969 — not by Nobel, but by Sweden’s central bank. It carries the Nobel name, yet it was never part of the original set. Economists like Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, celebrated for their neoliberal ideas, have long dominated the list of laureates.

Critics argue that the economics prize disproportionately rewards theories that justify deregulated markets, fiscal austerity, and centralized monetary control — ideas that benefit global finance but often undermine social welfare (The Nobel Prize and Economic Ideology, Ha-Joon Chang).

Ignoring radical alternatives

Economists who challenge the growth paradigm, question globalization, or advocate for degrowth and environmental sustainability rarely receive attention. The economic prize enforces a narrow ideological consensus — not an open contest of ideas. It has yet to honor those who predicted the 2008 crash, advocated public banking reforms, or exposed systemic inequalities at the heart of neoliberal globalization.

Economist Mariana Mazzucato, who highlights the role of the state in innovation, and Thomas Piketty, who has made wealth inequality a global issue, remain glaringly absent from the laureates list — likely because their work threatens dominant economic institutions.

Institutional opacity and power politics

Lack of accountability

The Nobel committees operate in almost total secrecy. Nominations are kept classified for 50 years, and selection criteria are not transparent. This allows room for lobbying, bias, and political maneuvering. Allegations of insider favoritism have plagued the Swedish Academy for years, culminating in a sexual abuse scandal that forced it to cancel the 2018 Literature Prize altogether (Nobel Scandal Erupts in Sweden, New York Times).

The “NATO Prize”

Especially in the Peace category, the Nobel Prize often appears to favor NATO-aligned figures and institutions. Whether it is the EU in 2012 or Ukrainian journalist groups in 2022, the narrative is consistently aligned with Western geopolitical priorities. Voices advocating peace from outside the Western sphere, such as anti-NATO activists, peace movements in the Middle East, or Russian dissidents not aligned with U.S. interests, are largely invisible.

Conclusion: the Nobel myth unmasked

The Nobel Prize may still inspire awe, but its authority is built on selective vision, not universal truth. It rewards narratives that support dominant power structures while marginalizing those who challenge the status quo. It glorifies symbolism over substance, politics over principle.

As George Orwell famously said, “All awards are political.” The Nobel Prize, for all its golden shine, may be the most political of all — a polished relic that masks Western ideological dominance with the language of progress and peace.

The time has come to demystify the Prize. True recognition of human achievement should reflect the diversity, complexity, and plurality of human experience — not the interests of a cultural elite cloaked in moral superiority.

References

  • Why Obama Won the Nobel Peace Prize, The Nobel Committee
  • The Drone Papers, The Intercept
  • The Nobel Peace Prize Is Political, Glenn Greenwald
  • The Nobel Prize in Literature: Eurocentrism and Bias, Le Monde Diplomatique
  • Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature, The Guardian
  • Rosalind Franklin and DNA, Brenda Maddox
  • The Politics of Science Awards, Nature
  • The Nobel Prize and Economic Ideology, Ha-Joon Chang
  • Nobel Scandal Erupts in Sweden, New York Times
  • The Case Against Henry Kissinger, Christopher Hitchens

The Artificial Appetite: The Hidden Dangers of Lab-Grown Food

23 April 2025

A synthetic solution to a fabricated crisis?

In recent years, lab-grown meat and synthetic vegetables have been marketed as miracle solutions to the environmental and ethical problems associated with traditional agriculture. Tech billionaires, food corporations, and global institutions such as the World Economic Forum have hailed these innovations as the future of food. The public is promised cleaner, cruelty-free alternatives to animal agriculture and more sustainable crops without pesticides or deforestation. But beneath the surface of these promises lies a disturbing reality: lab-grown food might not only fail to solve the problems it claims to address—it may create new ones that threaten health, freedom, and food sovereignty.

The illusion of sustainability

Manufacturing meat: a carbon conundrum

Lab-grown meat is often advertised as a green alternative to traditional meat, boasting lower greenhouse gas emissions and a smaller environmental footprint. However, recent life-cycle analyses cast serious doubt on these claims. A study from the University of California, Davis reveals that the energy requirements for cultivating animal cells in a lab—particularly in sterile, temperature-controlled bioreactors—are significantly higher than those of raising cattle in open fields (Environmental impacts of cultured meat production, Mattick et al.).

According to this study, if lab-grown meat is scaled using current methods, it could be up to 25 times more energy intensive than conventional beef. This is primarily due to the synthetic growth media required to feed the cells, which are derived from refined resources like glucose, amino acids, and vitamins that are themselves produced through energy-intensive industrial processes.

Resource-heavy, not resource-light

Synthetic foods also depend on rare minerals, plastics, and large-scale factory setups. Companies rely on high-tech infrastructure and global supply chains to produce, distribute, and refrigerate lab-grown products. This makes lab-grown food not a decentralized or local solution, but a corporate-controlled, resource-heavy model. The dependence on rare materials and energy undermines the very narrative that this is a climate-friendly food system (Cultured meat and the sustainability myth, Eva Hampl).

Health concerns: unnatural risks

Unknown long-term effects

Lab-grown meat is not just “meat without the animal.” It is a highly processed, bioengineered substance created through a mix of animal cells, growth factors, scaffolding materials, and bioreactor conditions that mimic muscle formation. Each step in this chain introduces potential contaminants and unknown side effects. As the American Council on Science and Health points out, cultured meat must often rely on fetal bovine serum or genetically modified yeast for cell growth—raising ethical and health red flags (Cultured meat: The health questions we’re not asking, Dr. Alex Berezow).

Despite being presented as clean, lab-grown food has not yet undergone the decades of epidemiological studies that back traditional food safety. We simply do not know the long-term consequences of consuming lab-manipulated muscle tissue or plant matter created from cell cultures. The risk of immune responses, microbiome disruptions, or chronic inflammation has yet to be ruled out.

Synthetic additives and ultra-processing

Lab-grown foods are often ultra-processed by necessity. In order to mimic the texture and flavor of real meat or vegetables, synthetic products rely heavily on binders, coloring agents, stabilizers, and artificial flavors. According to research published in the British Medical Journal, ultra-processed foods are associated with a higher risk of cancer, heart disease, and obesity (Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk, Fiolet et al.).

Replacing fresh, natural foods with synthetic equivalents could worsen public health, not improve it. What we gain in technological novelty, we may lose in nutritional value and metabolic resilience.

Corporate capture of the food chain

Consolidation and dependency

The push for lab-grown food is not being driven by farmers or consumers. It is being led by corporations, investors, and technocratic elites who stand to profit immensely from controlling the food supply. Companies like Eat Just, Upside Foods, and Beyond Meat are backed by venture capital and philanthropic arms of billionaires like Bill Gates, who have significant influence over global food policy and public discourse.

This creates a dangerous concentration of power. Instead of empowering local communities and farmers, lab-grown food replaces them with patents, proprietary tech, and centralized production models. Traditional farming becomes obsolete under a regime of sterile labs and bioengineered diets (Lab-grown meat: the rise of food monopolies, Nina Teicholz).

Technological colonialism

The global rollout of synthetic foods can be seen as a form of technological colonialism, particularly in the Global South. As international NGOs and climate institutions push for bans on livestock and subsistence agriculture in poorer countries, lab-grown alternatives produced in Western factories are marketed as humanitarian aid. This replaces food independence with a dependence on Western biotech firms, undermining food sovereignty in the name of sustainability (The politics of food tech, Raj Patel).

Ethical sleight of hand

Is it really cruelty-free?

Proponents claim lab-grown meat is “cruelty-free,” but this narrative is misleading. Most cultured meat still relies on animal-derived inputs at some stage, such as fetal bovine serum (harvested from the blood of slaughtered calves) or cell lines extracted from live animals. The industrial sourcing of these materials remains a violent and opaque process, hidden behind the promise of ethical eating (The ethical dilemma of synthetic meat, Dr. Melanie Joy).

Moreover, this ethical bait-and-switch risks distracting from the real reforms needed in animal agriculture: decentralization, humane treatment, and regenerative practices. Instead, we are sold a high-tech fantasy that does nothing to challenge the root causes of animal exploitation.

The psychological and cultural cost

Disconnection from nature

One of the most concerning aspects of lab-grown food is the growing psychological distance it creates between people and the natural world. Instead of cultivating, harvesting, or raising food through lived experience, consumers are reduced to passive recipients of lab-made substances produced in unknown conditions.

Food has historically been a deeply cultural, communal, and spiritual practice—one that connects us to land, ancestry, and seasons. Replacing this with sterile petri dishes and genetically programmed proteins undermines human identity and belonging (Eating as a moral act, Norman Wirzba).

The loss of food heritage

Traditional cuisines, which are tied to local biodiversity, cultural memory, and shared rituals, are being sidelined by a synthetic food culture driven by multinational firms. What happens to cheese without cows, wine without grapes, or bread without wheat? Lab-grown food threatens to erase millennia of agricultural knowledge and cultural richness in favor of engineered convenience.

Conclusion: food for thought, or synthetic submission?

Lab-grown food is being positioned as the savior of a broken food system. But its foundations are built on shaky science, immense energy consumption, corporate monopolization, and cultural dislocation. Rather than addressing the root problems of industrial agriculture, lab-grown alternatives replicate and amplify its worst tendencies: centralization, environmental damage, and detachment from life itself.

Real solutions lie in regenerative agriculture, food sovereignty, and ecological wisdom—not in surrendering our plates to biotech firms. What we eat is not just a matter of nutrition or efficiency—it is a reflection of our values, our relationship with nature, and our vision for the future.

References

  • Environmental impacts of cultured meat production, Mattick et al.
  • Cultured meat and the sustainability myth, Eva Hampl
  • Cultured meat: The health questions we’re not asking, Dr. Alex Berezow
  • Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk, Fiolet et al.
  • Lab-grown meat: the rise of food monopolies, Nina Teicholz
  • The politics of food tech, Raj Patel
  • The ethical dilemma of synthetic meat, Dr. Melanie Joy
  • Eating as a moral act, Norman Wirzba

Globalism: Progress or a Threat?

23 April 2025
Globalism a threat?

The debate over globalism is one of the most polarizing in modern political and economic discourse. Some argue that it represents the culmination of human progress: the dissolution of national boundaries, the promotion of free trade, global cooperation, and shared prosperity. Others see it as a threat to sovereignty, identity, democracy, and economic stability — a top-down agenda driven by unelected elites, multinational corporations, and supranational institutions.

This article examines globalism through a critical lens, questioning whether it truly serves the interests of ordinary people or whether it undermines them under the guise of progress.

What is globalism?

Globalism is the ideology or policy orientation that favors the integration of national economies, cultures, and governance systems into a unified global framework. It promotes the expansion of international institutions like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, and the European Union, as well as the strengthening of trade agreements and transnational legal frameworks.

Proponents view this as a natural evolution in an interconnected world. However, critics argue that it concentrates power in the hands of unaccountable entities, erodes local autonomy, and imposes one-size-fits-all policies across diverse nations.

The case for globalism as progress

Economic integration and trade

Supporters of globalism argue that free trade leads to prosperity, efficiency, and innovation. They cite the post-World War II economic boom and the expansion of global trade as examples of how international cooperation lifted millions out of poverty.

According to the World Bank (Global Economic Prospects, World Bank), globalization has contributed significantly to poverty reduction in emerging economies, particularly in East Asia. Increased trade has allowed developing countries to access markets, technology, and capital, fueling growth.

Peace and cooperation

Another common argument is that globalism reduces the risk of conflict. Economic interdependence supposedly makes war less attractive, as countries become stakeholders in one another’s stability. Institutions like the United Nations and the European Union are presented as peacekeeping mechanisms that mediate disputes and prevent the resurgence of nationalism and militarism.

This idea was captured by economic historian Richard Baldwin in his work (The Great Convergence, Baldwin), where he argues that technological advances in communication and logistics have naturally led to a more interconnected world — and that resisting this trend would be akin to fighting gravity.

Cosmopolitan values

Globalism is often aligned with values such as diversity, tolerance, environmental stewardship, and human rights. The spread of these ideals is considered a hallmark of progress, offering a counterbalance to authoritarianism and extremism. Organizations like Amnesty International and Greenpeace have used global platforms to push for reforms that go beyond borders.

The case for globalism as a threat

Despite these optimistic claims, many scholars, activists, and citizens view globalism not as liberation, but as a form of elite domination that disempowers the nation-state and democratic governance.

Erosion of sovereignty and democracy

One of the most powerful criticisms is that globalism undermines national sovereignty. Decision-making is increasingly outsourced to institutions that are not directly accountable to the public. This is evident in the European Union, where directives from Brussels often override national legislation, even when local populations vote against them in referenda (The European Union: A Critical Assessment, Bucher).

According to political scientist John Fonte, globalism creates “post-democratic governance” by replacing citizen control with technocratic rule (Sovereignty or Submission, Fonte). Citizens are no longer voting for policies but for administrators who are bound by international treaties, trade pacts, and sustainability goals imposed from above.

Economic dislocation

While globalization has brought growth to parts of the world, it has also devastated local economies, particularly in the West. Deindustrialization, wage stagnation, and job losses have hit working-class communities in Europe and North America, leading to widespread resentment.

The outsourcing of manufacturing to lower-wage countries like China and India has made consumer goods cheaper, but at the cost of domestic employment. As economist Dani Rodrik notes, globalization creates winners and losers — and the latter are often abandoned by political elites (The Globalization Paradox, Rodrik).

The “China shock” — a term coined by economists David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson — refers to the massive loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs following China’s entry into the WTO in 2001. The consequences included rising inequality, political polarization, and the opioid crisis in some American communities (The China Shock, Autor et al.).

Cultural homogenization

Critics also argue that globalism erodes cultural identity. As global corporations spread across the globe, local traditions, languages, and lifestyles are replaced by homogenized products and values. The rise of “McWorld” — a term coined by Benjamin Barber — describes how global consumer culture replaces rich, local diversity with uniformity (Jihad vs. McWorld, Barber).

This is not merely a cultural loss, but a political one. National identity often forms the basis of social cohesion and democratic participation. When these bonds weaken, people become more alienated, opening the door to populism, extremism, or apathy.

Centralized power and surveillance

Another dimension of the globalist agenda is the push for centralized data control and surveillance. From digital ID systems to centralized digital currencies, citizens are increasingly tracked and regulated by supranational institutions, sometimes under the pretense of safety or efficiency.

As Shoshana Zuboff outlines in her book (The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Zuboff), the merger of state power and corporate data monopolies threatens individual freedom and democratic accountability.

The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” initiative — which aims to remake capitalism in the wake of crises like COVID-19 — has been accused of promoting an unelected, technocratic vision of global governance that bypasses democratic consent (COVID-19: The Great Reset, Schwab and Malleret).

Who benefits from globalism?

It is often the case that the rhetoric of “global cooperation” masks the interests of multinational corporations, financial institutions, and unelected elites. While ordinary citizens are told to make sacrifices for sustainability, social justice, or economic growth, these actors continue to accumulate wealth and power.

For example, tax havens and global financial deregulation have allowed the ultra-wealthy to avoid paying taxes while middle classes are burdened by austerity and inflation. According to the Global Tax Evasion Report by the EU Tax Observatory, over $10 trillion is held offshore, largely by the global elite (Global Tax Evasion Report, EU Tax Observatory).

Meanwhile, transnational trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) or the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) are often negotiated in secrecy and prioritize investor protections over public welfare (Shadow Sovereignty, Corporate Europe Observatory).

Is resistance possible?

In recent years, we have seen a wave of resistance to globalism. The Brexit vote, the election of Donald Trump, the Yellow Vests in France, and the rise of populist parties across Europe signal that many citizens are rejecting the globalist consensus. They seek to reclaim national sovereignty, cultural identity, and democratic control.

Critics warn, however, that globalism is not just a policy — it is an entrenched system supported by the world’s most powerful actors. Reversing it requires more than changing governments; it would require a rethinking of the postwar order and a reassertion of local, democratic authority.

Conclusion

Globalism is not an inherently neutral or benevolent force. While it has enabled cooperation, technological progress, and economic growth for some, it has also deepened inequality, eroded sovereignty, and empowered unaccountable elites. The question is not whether globalism is happening — it is — but whether it serves the interests of the people or the few.

To view globalism as inevitable progress is to ignore the social, economic, and cultural costs it imposes. True progress should be measured not by how globalized a society becomes, but by how just, democratic, and sovereign it remains.

References

  • Global Economic Prospects, World Bank
  • The Great Convergence, Richard Baldwin
  • Sovereignty or Submission, John Fonte
  • The European Union: A Critical Assessment, Bucher
  • The Globalization Paradox, Dani Rodrik
  • The China Shock, Autor, Dorn, Hanson
  • Jihad vs. McWorld, Benjamin Barber
  • The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Shoshana Zuboff
  • COVID-19: The Great Reset, Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret
  • Global Tax Evasion Report, EU Tax Observatory
  • Shadow Sovereignty, Corporate Europe Observatory
2025 Rexje.. All rights reserved.
X